Operational Excellence through Leadership and Compliance

Maritime Compliance Report

Welcome. Staying in compliance takes dedication, diligence and strong leadership skills to stay on top of all the requirements which seem to keep coming at a rapid pace. With this blog I hope to provide visitors with content that will help them in their daily work of staying in compliance. I hope you find it a resource worthy of your time and I look forward to your feedback, questions, comments and concerns. Thanks for stopping by. To avoid missing critical updates, don’t forget to sign up by clicking the white envelope in the blue toolbar below.

Public Forum on New Towing Vessel Regulations

The public forum sponsored by Maritime Compliance International, LLC held in New Orleans on September 9 was intended to inform the industry, not just on the contents of the NPRM, but also to discuss the implications and the intent of it all. The forum provided industry stakeholders with an overview of the regulations along with some insights, based on my past experience as a Coast Guard marine inspector, as to what it all might look like when fully implemented. This spurred some interesting discussions and some great comments which will be posted to the docket.





It was interesting to find that not everyone was aware that the Subchapter offers a clear choice for operators between tradition Coast Guard inspections and the third party Towing Safety Management System option.


In addition to an overview of the regulations, I presented a session on "Safety Management Systems – Intent and Implications." It is important for all owners and operators to be fully educated on these issues so that they can make the best choice for their company.


Some of the comments made to be posted on the docket include:


One commenter mentioned the pilothouse alerter system initial alarm must be set to a volume which will be effective in alerting the operator, but not loud enough to disturb the other captain and crew sleeping immediately below the wheelhouse.

One commenter remarked that during certain TSAC meetings it was mentioned that Subchapter M would be similar to Subchapter T and L, and that he didn't find it similar to either.

One commenter mentioned that this proposed rule was very restrictive as to which company employees could conduct internal audits, which seemed to be in conflict with ISM protocol which is not so restrictive.

One commenter suggested that clarification was needed on reporting visitors on board and excursion requirements, to allow for standard industry practice.

One commenter expressed great disappointment in the fact that there were no requirements to address fatigue, such as manning and working hours.
Just in from the EPA...
Public Forum - Towing Vessel Regulations - Update
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Guest
Friday, 19 September 2025

Contact Us

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Phone: 504.249.5291

Copyright ©
Maritime Compliance International
All rights reserved | Privacy Policy

Maritime Compliance Report Sign-Up

Click here to subscribe to the Maritime Compliance Report blog for critical email updates on compliance issues.